Skip to main content
Log in

Initial performance of a high capacity surface-flow treatment wetland

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Columbia Wastewater Treatment Wetland (“Columbia Wetland”) is a constructed cattail wetland in the Missouri River floodplain outside Columbia, Missouri, USA. the wetland receives mixed primary and secondary effluent (≈60,000 m3 d−1, BOD5≈30 mg L−1, TSS≈13 mg L−1, NH4−N≈8 mg L−1) from a conventional treatment plant. During its first 6 years of operation (October 1994 through November 2000), the wetland received loadings of BOD5, COD, and NH4−N averaging 50 83, and 12 kg ha−1 d−1, respectively, of which averages of 74%, 30%, and 17%, respectively, were removed from the effluent. TSS (mean loading =21 kg ha−1 d−1) frequently increased in the wetland due to erosion and disturbance by waterfowl, but TSS removal efficiency increased with time and the development of macrophyte biomass and averaged 30% by 1998. The wetland typically removed >97% of fecal coliforms and fecal streptococcus, 36% of TN and 4% of TP. In comparison to other large treatment wetlands, BOD removal by the Columbia Wetland has been exceptionally efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • A. P. H. A. 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edition. American Public Health Association, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, G. W. and R. H. Kadlec. 1993. Effluent restores wetland hydrology. Water Environment and Technology 5:61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumpton, W. G., T. M. Isenhart, and P. D. Mitchell. 1992. Nitrate and organic N analyses with second-derivative spectroscopy. Limnology and Oceanography 37:907–913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiley, P. C. 1995. The reality of sewage treatment using wetlands. Water Science and Technology 32:329–338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R. H. and R. L. Knight. 1996. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L. 1992. Ancillary benefits and potential problems with the use of wetlands for nonpoint source pollution control. Ecological Engineering 1:97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L., R. W. Ruble, R. H. Kadlec, and S. C. Reed 1993. Wetlands for wastewater treatment performance database. p. 35–58. In G. A. Moshiri (ed.) Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L. 1997. Wildlife habitat and public use benefits of treatment wetlands. Water Science and Technology 35:35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, M. F. 1984. Flow-through microcuvette for fluorometric determination of chlorophyll. Water Resources Bulletin 20:795–799.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, H. G. 1998. Use of constructed wetlands to process agricultural wastewater. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78:199–210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prepas, E. E. and F. A. Rigler. 1982. Improvements in quantifying the phosphorus concentration in lake water. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39:822–829.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sartory, D. P. and J. U. Grobbelaar. 1984. Extraction of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton for spectrophotometric analysis. Hydrobiologia, 114:177–187.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. K., J. J. Sartoris, J. S. Thullen, and D. C. Andersen. 2000. Investigation of denitrification rates in an ammonia-dominated constructed wastewater-treatment wetland. Wetlands 20:684–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spieles, D. J. and W. J. Mitsch. 2000. The effects of season and hydrologic and chemical loading on nitrate retention in constructed wetlands: a comparison of low-and high-nutrient riverine system. Ecological Engineering 14:77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. E. P. A. 1999. Free water surface wetlands for wastewater treatment. A technology assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. EPA 832-S-99-002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, J. T. A. and A. F. M. Meuleman. 1999. Wetlands for wastewater treatment: Opportunities and limitation. Ecological Engineering 12:5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, P., K. J. Peberdy, and M. C. Millett. 1997. Constructed wetlands and nature conservation. Water Science and Technology 35:205–213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew F. Knowlton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knowlton, M.F., Cuvellier, C. & Jones, J.R. Initial performance of a high capacity surface-flow treatment wetland. Wetlands 22, 522–527 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0522:IPOAHC]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0522:IPOAHC]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation